Employee Inventions*
Bundesgerichtshof
Judgement of 05 February 2013, file no. X ZR 59/12 – Genveränderungen
Oberlandessgericht Frankfurt a.M.
Judgement of 07. December 2017, file no. 6 U 204/16 (Attribution of group revenues against the German based R&D employer)
Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf
Judgement of 30 November 2017, file no. I-2 U 77/16 – Retardtablette (invention disclosure, assignment)
Landgericht Düsseldorf
Judgement of 28 April 2016, file no. 4a O 154/14 – Elektrische Lampen
Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf
Judgement of 26 April 2012, file no. 2 U 24/11 – Klebstoffzusammensetzung
Landgericht Frankfurt a. M.
Judgement of 22 October 2014, file no. 206 O 214/14 – Sequestration
Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf
Judgement of 26 June 2008, file no. 2 U 61/06 – Lasergravur
Landgericht Düsseldorf
Final judgement of 27 April 2010, file no. 4b O 138/06 – Vergütungsfestsetzung
Landgericht Düsseldorf
Judgement of 18 January 2011, file no. 4b O 7/10 – Genveränderung
Landgericht Düsseldorf
Partial judgement of 17 April 2007, file no. 4b O 138/06 – Breitbettfelge
Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf
Judgement of 31 October 2002, file no. 2 U 91/99 – Abgasreinigung in Oxidationsprozessen
Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf
Judgement of 13 September 2007, file no. 2 U 113/05 – Türinnenverstärkung
Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf
Judgement of 04 March 2004, file no. 2 U 123/97 – Craft Spulköpfe
Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf
Judgement of 16 August 2001, file no. 2 U 105/00 – Abwasserbehandlung
Landgericht Düsseldorf
Judgement of 23 January 1996, file no. 4 O 42/94 – Hochregalanlage
Landgericht Düsseldorf
Judgement of 27 August 1996, file no. 4 O 329/95 – Alarmglasscheiben
Landgericht Düsseldorf
Judgement of 13 October 1998, file no. 4 O 192/94 – Schaltungsanordnung für dynamisches Mikrophon
Patentrecht
BGH, judgement of 2 November 2011, file no. X ZR 23/09 – Notablaufvorrichtung
Marken- und Kennzeichnungsrecht
BGH, judgement of 28 August 2003, file no. I ZR 257/00 -Kinder
BGH, judgement of 09 July 2009, file no. I ZB 88/07 -ROCHER-Kugel
Wettbewerbsrecht
BGH, judgement of 07 December 2006, file no. I ZR 166/03 -Umsatzzuwachs
* Prof. Dr. Trimborn was involved in the following cases, either personally representing the client or in an advisory function in at least one instance. The total number of IP cases is several hundred.